Thread:Lexinatrix/@comment-27645494-20160315171410/@comment-27867911-20160315172444

Hi, I reverted some of your changes because they were needlessly verbose, and were more stylistic changes rather than substantive ones.

The factual error was in stating that a plain text editor will display XML properly, when that is not the case. You need a more robust text editor that supports code formatting (like Notepad++) to keep the formatting intact and readable. Windows Notepad, for example, is infamous for mangling code.

As for duplicating links... that was necessitated by your editing of my original copy. Had that copy remained intact, there would have been only one set of links. Especially in technical documentation, linking to additional resources more than once is common, because you can't predict the entry point for the reader.

Hope that helps!

Lex