Thread:Wc8/@comment-177-20131220230954/@comment-9714035-20131221065611

Well, I gotta admit that I'm still a little confused by the class system so it's a little hard to evaluate what you're working on. That said, I think the Warrior page is pretty straight forward. I especially like the infobox (I added links to STR and CON).

Another thing I'd say is that the wiki is starting to get complicated what with the templates and all, and I'm confused by that too. Part of me says stay simple so lots of people can edit and feel like the wiki is accessible and another part of me says use all the tools and make it efficient. Personally, I think we want a bunch of people working on the wiki so that the load gets distributed and so that there's a lot of eyes proofing and fact checking. I think more eyes will result in greater accuracy and completeness.

Finally, one of the best arguments in my mind for cobbling together from a lot of shorts is that it allows linking to short answers from the game. I wonder if we could get mouseovers of the wiki in the game. I doubt it but that would be nice.

So, I don't know if I'm answering your question, but I guess I'd say go for the fancy, powerful solution on one page and then ask for even more feedback from current editors. Maybe start a discussion in forums and see what people say.

Maybe we make a template if some info is going to be used on more than x number of pages? 2, 3 or 4? It's sure handy having the stub and speculation templates.

That's all the rambling I got in me for the night. I'm impressed by how much you're both doing on classes. I'm kind of sidelined at this point. Watching but not doing much.