Thread:LadyAlys/@comment-25820458-20150722123646/@comment-24150802-20150722135031

It was deleted for the reasons I listed in the Talk page. I asked there for contrasting opinions about my ideas and no one replied. After several days, I deleted the page, since no one had objected.

I understand that you're not happy about the deletion, and I am willing to talk about it, but please don't be sarcastic when you discuss it. Comments like "maybe it's surprice for you" and "If you don't know what 'wiki disambiguation' is... well, I don't know. There's a thing called 'web search engines', y'know? Google, for an example." aren't helpful and sound insulting even if that was not the intention. I'd like us to talk about this politely and respectfully.

As I had mentioned in the Talk page, I added the word "chest" to the Enchanted Armoire page, so now if you do a search for "chest", the Enchanted Armoire comes up first in the search results. This achieves the requirement for "chest" search results without the need for a redirection page. It's also a better solution because the redirection page can give the impression that "chest" is an alternative name for the Enchanted Armoire, and it is not. It's good that people can find that page by searching for "chest", but we don't want it to seem like an appropriate title for the page.

Also as I had mentioned on the Talk page, the word "chest" is very likely to appear in other pages in the near future because we will be discussing the upcoming change from the HabitRPG chest logo to the Habitica gryphon logo. Because of this, it makes sense now to plan for that and not have a redirection page in place that would prevent the other pages appearing in search results.

You are right that a disambiguation page could be used, but I believe there's no real reason for it when normal search results can be used instead.

You are welcome to reply if you have any responses to this that you'd like us to discuss.