User blog comment:TetoIsGreat/Back to Twenty Five/@comment-24672610-20150314012328/@comment-24150802-20150314132524

Improving capitalisation in subheadings has good and bad sides to it. On the one hand, proper capitalisation is good for consistency and so makes the wiki look more professional - it definitely does help in that way!

On the other hand, as Purplatypus has said, it can break existing links to subheadings. I know there has been at least one time in the past when I reverted a subheading capitalisation change for exactly that reason, but that was for a heading that I knew was frequently used in links that we put in the Tavern and other places - in that case it was important that those links kept working.

But for subheadings that aren't used much or at all in links elsewhere... I'm a bit on the fence about it but I think in those cases the consistency of neatly capitalised headings is more important than the small risk of a link somewhere being broken. There's been several times in the past when I haven't reverted subheading changes because I knew the subheadings were unlikely to have links to them.

TetoIsGreat, the subheading changes you made recently definitely fall into the second category - I don't think they would have been used in links and I liked the consistency that you gave to the headings.

I realise that I am behaving inconsistently when I revert some heading changes and not others and I'm sorry that made things harder for you. :(