Thread:Lexinatrix/@comment-27645494-20160315171410/@comment-27645494-20160315173853

My edits were intended to improve clarity -- I'm actually very conservative in making edits as I understand that style may be a matter of opinion. For example, there are spaces and periods other than the consecutive ones in the code sample, so I thought it was necessary to specify that we were talking about the consecutive ones. Additionally, I added an "of" to "Further discussion and context for this sample code" (the original phrasing) because we generally say "discussion of", not "discussion for".

Notepad++ can be used as a plain text editor, so the current wording is confusing. May I suggest "A plain-text editor may not display the XML formatting properly, so consider using a more robust text editor such as Notepad++"?

The word "aforementioned" was meant to signal that Notepad++ had been linked to previously. The Wikipedia Manual of Style advises against repeated links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_not_be_linked. One reason for this is that screen readers (for people who are sight impaired/blind) allow users to skip through a page from link to link.